PYRALINK INNOVATION LTD · UK HEADQUARTERS
UK Cybersecurity & Secure AI Products Direct: +44 191 300 2979
Pyralink Innovation Ltd
Request a Demo ↗

Pyralink™ Prove It / Secure AI Toolkit / Playbook

Playbook · Free

AI incident response mini-playbook

A short, printable playbook for responding to AI-related security incidents, such as data pasted into a public tool, a prompt-injected agent, a compromised AI package or a deepfake payment request. For small and mid-size teams.

By Michael Adedeji · Last reviewed 31 October 2026 · General information, not legal advice

Download Markdown
Pyralink™ Prove It · Secure AI Toolkit · pyralink.co.uk/newsletter/toolkit/ai-incident-response-playbook · Last reviewed 31 October 2026. General information, not legal advice.

This is a short playbook for the first hours of an AI-related incident. It sits alongside your normal incident plan. It will not cover every case, but it gives a team without a dedicated security function a clear order of operations.

Print it, fill in the contact boxes, and put a copy somewhere you can reach when email is down.

Not legal advice. If personal data may be involved, or you are in a regulated sector, take advice early, and check your reporting duties.

Incident lead: ______________ Deputy: ______________ Security contact (out of hours): ______________ Legal / data protection contact: ______________ Insurer helpline: ______________

What counts as an AI incident

Treat any of these as an incident, even if you are not sure yet:

  • Confidential, personal or secret information was entered into an AI tool that is not approved for it.
  • An AI agent or assistant did something it was not asked to do, or acted on instructions from content it read (prompt injection).
  • An AI tool, plug-in, model, package or container you use was reported as compromised (a supply chain incident).
  • API keys, tokens or credentials for an AI service were exposed, or there is unexplained usage or spend.
  • An AI tool exposed one user's data to another.
  • Someone used a deepfake or voice clone to impersonate a colleague, supplier or customer, for example to ask for a payment.
  • AI output caused harm, such as a wrong decision, discrimination or a published error, and it needs a managed response.

1. Spot and report

2. Triage in the first 30 minutes

3. Contain

Pick the actions that fit the type.

Type Containment actions
Data pasted into an unapproved AI tool Record exactly what was entered and into which tool and account. Delete the conversation if the tool allows it (this does not prove the provider has deleted it). Check the tool's settings and terms on retention and training. Contact the provider's privacy or support route to request deletion if appropriate. Block or restrict the tool for the team if needed
Prompt-injected or misbehaving AI agent Stop the agent and cut its access: revoke its tokens and connections. Preserve logs. Identify the content it read and the actions it took. Check what it sent, created, changed or installed
Compromised package, model or container Stop running the affected environment. Identify every system that pulled the affected version. Rebuild from a known good, pinned version. Treat every credential reachable from those systems as exposed. Rotate them
Exposed API key or unexplained spend Revoke the key immediately. Create a new one. Set spend limits and alerts. Review usage logs for the period. Check for other secrets in the same place
One user's data visible to another Take the feature offline or restrict it. Capture what was shown, to whom, and when. Contact the supplier and ask for their incident report
Deepfake or voice-clone impersonation Do not make the payment or share the data. Confirm with the real person on a trusted channel. If money was sent, call your bank immediately, then report to Report Fraud. Warn staff
Harmful or wrong AI output Stop the output being used or published. Identify who has seen or acted on it. Correct it and tell those affected

The LiteLLM compromise of 21 October 2026 is a useful example of the supply chain row. LiteLLM's own guidance was not to run Python or pip in an affected environment, to remove the malicious files, to rebuild using a pinned earlier version, to rotate every credential the environment could reach, and to check cloud audit logs. Microsoft's analysis of the incident recommends hash-pinned dependency lockfiles, image digests instead of floating tags, and restricted outbound traffic.

4. Preserve evidence

5. Assess impact and duty to report

6. Eradicate and recover

7. Communicate

8. Learn and improve

Within two weeks, hold a blameless review.

Decision log template

Time (24h) Decision or action By whom Why Evidence reference

Sources

Get one practical fix every Monday

Pyralink™ Prove It is a free weekly email on cloud and AI security, with a link for every claim.

Subscribe by email